PsychIndex does not sell, broker, arrange, process, finance, ship, import, export, produce, possess, transfer, verify, guarantee, recommend, promote, endorse, rank for purchase, or facilitate any product, service, order, payment, transaction, delivery, or unlawful activity. PsychIndex does not accept affiliate fees, referral fees, commissions, gifts, sponsored placement, paid ranking, vendor-submitted placement control, or compensation from listed third parties.

Do not use PsychIndex to buy, sell, request, arrange, finance, ship, import, export, produce, possess, traffic, transfer, or otherwise deal in controlled substances, cannabis products, prescription products, unlawful goods, or unlawful services. Nothing on PsychIndex is intended to aid, abet, counsel, procure, solicit, incite, encourage, assist, or participate in any offence, including conduct described in the Criminal Code, section 21, Criminal Code, section 22, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, section 2, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, section 5, Cannabis Act, section 17, Cannabis Act, section 18, or the Competition Act, section 52. Users are responsible for checking all applicable laws in their jurisdiction and for using all information lawfully.

All listings, links, names, domains, tags, filters, categories, status indicators, labels, summaries, highlight placement, WHOIS links, Discord links, and external references are informational metadata only. They are not offers, invitations, advertisements, referrals, recommendations, endorsements, safety claims, quality claims, legality claims, availability claims, purchase instructions, payment instructions, delivery instructions, or verification of any third party.

Outbound links use privacy-preserving link attributes where supported, including noreferrer, and are not used to pass referral data, affiliate identifiers, commissions, endorsements, or vendor analytics.

PsychIndex relies on lawful expression principles, including Canadian Charter section 2(b), freedom of expression, and the hyperlink-publication distinction discussed in Crookes v. Newton, 2011 SCC 47, while recognizing that no disclaimer, link, label, or expression right authorizes unlawful conduct or prevents enforcement where the law applies.